Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.

451 N.E.2d 195 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.

New York Court of Appeals
451 N.E.2d 195 (1983)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

In 1964 Wallace Steel and Supply Company (Wallace) purchased a shearing machine from Richards Shear Company (defendant). In 1968 Logemann Brothers Company (Logemann) (defendant) acquired most of Richard Shear’s assets and obtained the exclusive right to manufacture and sell Richard Shear machinery but did not assume Richard Shear’s tort liability. Richard Shear did not merge into Logemann, and Logemann was not a continuation of Richard Shear. Logemann notified Wallace of the acquisition and began servicing Wallace’s machine. In 1978 Otto F. Schumacher (plaintiff), a Wallace employee, was blinded when he was hit by a piece of metal thrown from the shearing machine. Schumacher sued Richards Shear and Logemann in New York state court under theories of strict products liability and negligence. Schumacher filed two claims against Logemann: one for strict products liability based on Richard Shear’s actions, and one for its failure to warn Wallace of a defect in the shearing machine. Logemann filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that it could not be held liable for the strict-products-liability claim as Richard Shear’s successor and that it had no duty to warn Wallace of a defect in the machine. The trial court granted summary judgment for Logemann and dismissed the complaint. The appellate court affirmed the trial court. Schumacher appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Simmons, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership