Schumm v. Schumm
Minnesota Court of Appeals
510 N.W.2d 13 (1993)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
August Schumm (plaintiff) and Brenda Schumm (defendant) both sought custody of their 12-year-old and nine-year-old children. The trial court held a custody hearing, at which it found that Brenda’s ability to care for the children was adversely affected by her major mood disorder and history of severe vascular headaches. The trial court further found that Brenda’s health conditions had resulted in (1) the children having to care for her, (2) an automobile accident involving one of the children, and (3) Brenda dropping lighted cigarettes. At the hearing, a custody evaluator also presented findings that Brenda had a potential chemical dependency and that her prescribed medications had affected her daily functioning and had led to her losing her licensed practical nurse (LPN) license and multiple jobs. The trial court found that August had changed his employment so that he could better care for the children and had strong family support. The trial court also found that Brenda had served as the primary caregiver when the children were younger and that Brenda and August both had a good relationship with the children. The trial court also made a finding concerning the children’s custodial preferences. Following the hearing, the trial court granted August sole physical custody. Brenda appealed on the ground that the trial court misapplied statutory requirements relating to the parent’s health in custody disputes.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lansing, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.