From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...
Schwartz v. Swan
Illinois Appellate Court
211 N.E.2d 122 (Ill. App. 1965)
Bray (defendant) and Swan (defendant) allegedly caused an automobile accident, which injured Dorothy Schwartz (Dorothy) (plaintiff). Ten days later, Dorothy was involved in another automobile accident, which was allegedly caused by Polivick (defendant). Dorothy then sued Bray, Swan, and Polivick jointly. Bray, Swan, and Polivick filed motions to sever the single action into two, one for the first accident and one for the second. They argued that the jury could be confused by the complexity of the case as not all defendants are culpable for the harm alleged. Dorothy argued that there was no way to distinguish between which accident caused or contributed to her injuries. The trial judge severed the case without providing a rationale. Dorothy appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Goldenhersh, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.