Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Schwartzenberger v. Hunt Trust Estate

North Dakota Supreme Court
244 N.W.2d 711 (N.D. 1976)


Facts

Matt and Ruth Schwartzenberger (plaintiffs) signed an oil and gas lease, leasing oil and gas rights on their property to the William Herbert Hunt Trust Estate (Trust Estate) (defendant). The lease provided that if drilling did not commence within one year of the lease’s execution, the lease would terminate, unless Trust Estate paid a per-acreage delay rental to the Schwartzenbergers. During negotiations, Mr. Schwartzenberger mistakenly told Trust Estate that the Schwartzenbergers owned—and thus the lease covered—less acreage than they actually did. The parties signed the lease under this false belief, as Trust Estate did not check the deed. Trust Estate did not commence drilling within one year of the lease being signed. Rather, Trust Estate paid the Schwartzenbergers a delay rental based on the acreage that the parties had discussed, rather than the actual acreage of the Schwartzenbergers’ property. The Schwartzenbergers informed Trust Estate of the mistake, but Trust Estate denied that it was required to pay the difference. The Schwartzenbergers gave notice of termination of the lease to Trust Estate. Despite this, Trust Estate did not file a release of the lease. The Schwartzenbergers filed suit, seeking a judgment that the lease was terminated. The trial court found that the lease should be reformed to correct the mutual mistake, and continue in effect as reformed so long as Trust Estate paid the Schwartzenbergers the deficient amount. The Schwartzenbergers appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Erickstad, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.