Schwarz v. Schwarz

5 A.3d 548 (2010)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schwarz v. Schwarz

Connecticut Appellate Court
5 A.3d 548 (2010)

SC
Play video

Facts

Alan Schwarz (defendant) and Majella Schwarz (plaintiff) entered into a separation agreement under which Alan would pay Majella $2,000 per week in alimony. The agreement stated that it was subject to Connecticut alimony law. At the time, Alan’s annual income was $373,620. Majella had leukemia, which required significant health insurance coverage. As part of the parties’ settlement agreement, Alan paid Majella’s health insurance for three years. After the divorce, Majella moved in with her new boyfriend, Arthur Kane. After Alan’s payment of her health insurance ended, Majella got a job working part-time for Kane. Rather than paying Majella a wage, Kane paid for her health insurance. However, due to circumstances beyond Kane’s control, he lost the ability to pay for Majella’s health insurance. Kane began paying Majella a wage instead, but the wage did not cover her health insurance costs, which had increased. Alan filed a petition to modify his alimony payment based on Majella living with Kane. At the time of filing, Alan’s annual income was $450,000. Majella filed a cross motion to increase alimony payments based on her increased need with respect to health insurance and Alan’s increased income. The trial court, taking into account both parties’ changed circumstances, increased Alan’s alimony payment to $2,175 per week. Alan appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beach, J.)

Dissent (Flynn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Family Law

Key Terms