Seale v. Bates
Colorado Supreme Court
359 P.2d 356 (1961)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Philip and Louise Seale (plaintiffs) prepaid the Bates Dance Studio, Inc. (Bates Studio) (defendant), owned by John Bates (defendant), for 600 dance lessons. The Seales’ contract with the Bates Studio was not cancellable and did not permit any refunds. Nor did the agreement include specifics about the instruction such as instructor assignments or studio quality. The Bates Studio later transferred all of its contracts to the Dale Dance Studio (Dale Studio) (defendant). The Seales were told that the Bates Studio instructors were moving to the Dale Studio and that all instruction would be the same after the transfer. The Seales continued their lessons at the Dale Studio but were dissatisfied because of the instructors they received and the quality of the studio space. They complained a number of times to no avail and eventually stopped after 30 classes. The Seales sued the defendants, as did Martin Hanscome (plaintiff), another student with the same concerns. After hearing plaintiffs’ evidence at a bench trial, the court dismissed their complaint. Plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Doyle, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.