Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Midcap
Delaware Supreme Court
893 A.2d 542 (2006)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Terry Midcap purchased a gas stove from Sears (defendant). Midcap received his propane gas from Southern States (defendant). There was a leak in the connection of the stove that eventually caused an explosion. The explosion killed Midcap and demolished Midcap’s home. Midcap’s estate, wife, and children (plaintiffs) sued Sears and Southern States for wrongful death. Allstate Insurance Company provided insurance to the Midcaps and brought a separate subrogation action against Sears and Southern States. The plaintiffs asserted that Southern States had a duty to check the gas connections and failed to do so. The plaintiffs introduced proof at trial of the GAS Check program, which was a voluntary inspection program adopted by some propane gas suppliers. The GAS Check program has not been adopted as a mandatory program by any state or federal agency. Various suppliers implement the program in different ways, including performing an inspection when a new customer is added or upon request. The trial court permitted the plaintiffs’ expert to provide testimony regarding the GAS Check program but did not allow the expert to testify that the GAS Check program constituted the relevant standard of care in the propane-supply industry. The jury returned a verdict against Sears and awarded $3.1 million in damages to the plaintiffs. The jury returned a verdict against the plaintiffs on the claims against Southern States. All parties appealed different issues.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.