Seattle Electric Co. v. Hovden
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
190 F. 7 (1911)
- Written by Meagan Anglin, JD
Facts
Lena Hovden (plaintiff) was walking outside when she attempted to cross the street. Hovden, despite being of mature age, did not have the intelligence of an ordinary person and was unable to care for herself. On the day in question, rather than crossing at the crosswalk, she elected to cross in the middle of the street. While she was crossing, she noticed a streetcar driving at a high speed. Hovden continued to cross the street, and she was hit by the speeding streetcar. Hovden brought a suit against Seattle Electric Co. (defendant), the employer of the driver (defendant) of the speeding streetcar for negligence, alleging the driver was driving the streetcar at a dangerous speed and without giving any warning signals. The district court declined to give a jury instruction on contributory negligence, and the jury found for Hovden. The driver appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gilbert, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
