Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart
United States Supreme Court
467 U.S. 20 (1984)
Seattle Times Co. (Seattle Times) (defendant) published articles critical of the Aquarian Foundation (Aquarian), a religious group. Rhinehart (plaintiff), the spiritual leader of the Aquarian Foundation, brought suit against Seattle Times for defamation and invasion of privacy. The trial court allowed broad discovery, ordering Rhinehart, for purposes of the trial, to identify donors to Aquarian as well as how much they donate, and to produce a list of Aquarian’s members. However, the court also issued a protective order prohibiting the Seattle Times from publishing the information. Both sides appealed and the Supreme Court of Washington affirmed, finding that dissemination of the donor and member information would result in “annoyance, embarrassment and even oppression.” The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.