SEC v. Moran (Moran I)

922 F. Supp. 867 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

SEC v. Moran (Moran I)

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
922 F. Supp. 867 (1996)

KS

Facts

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) filed suit against Frederick Augustus Moran (Moran Sr.) and Frederick Winston Moran (Moran Jr.) (defendants), alleging that the Morans had engaged in insider trading in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 § 10(b). The SEC charged that Moran Jr., while employed by Salomon Brothers Inc., relayed material nonpublic information about a merger between Bell Atlantic Corporation and Telecommunications Incorporated (TCI) to Moran Sr., who in turn relied upon the insider information from his son to inform his purchase of cable stocks. The Morans denied the charges and sought a dismissal of the case, arguing that Moran Jr. had not shared material nonpublic information with his father. Additionally, the Morans explained that Moran Sr. had made investments based upon insider information provided by his son and that his significant investment in cable stocks was instead motivated by other factors, including the actions of John Malone, a cable-industry expert. After a bench trial, the court explained its decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership