SEC v. U.S. Environmental, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
155 F.3d. 107 (1998)

- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) charged John Romano (defendant) with market manipulation in a scheme to manipulate the price of U.S. Environmental, Inc. Romano was a trader and registered representative of a broker-dealer, Castle Securities Corporation (Castle). Castle agreed to manipulate the stock of U.S. Environmental, Inc. under the direction of Mark D’Onofrio, the stock’s promoter. While Romano did not design or instigate the plan to manipulate the stock price of U.S. Environmental, he did execute the buy and sell orders as directed by D’Onofrio. When executing D’Onofrio’s orders, Romano knew or was reckless in not knowing that the purpose of the transactions was to inflate the market for U.S. Environmental stock. Romano argued that because he did not share the D’Onofrio’s purpose in wanting to manipulate the U.S. Environmental stock, he was not liable for market manipulation. The district court dismissed the case, determining that Romano was not liable, and the SEC appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.