SEC v. Unifund SAL
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
910 F.2d 1028 (1990)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
In 1990, Rorer Group, Inc. (Rorer), a Pennsylvania pharmaceutical company, entered into a merger with Rhone-Poulenc, S.A. (Rhone), a French corporation. Prior to this merger, Unifund SAL (Unifund) (defendant), acquired over $2 million in Rorer stock. It sold this stock immediately after the announcement of the merger, earning a substantial profit as a result. Two days after the merger announcement, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) brought suit against Unifund and several other defendants for insider trading, in violation of § 10(b) of the Exchange Act. The SEC’s complaint did not name the source of the tip, as is customary in insider trading cases to prove that nonpublic information has been distributed. The SEC also obtained a preliminary injunction from the district court, prohibiting Unifund from engaging in future securities law violations, and freezing its accounts indefinitely. The district court cited Unifund’s substantial profit after the merger in issuing the preliminary injunction. Unifund appealed the preliminary injunction to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.