Second National Bank of New Haven v. Harris & Trust Savings Bank

29 Conn. Super. 275, 283 A.2d 226 (1971)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Second National Bank of New Haven v. Harris & Trust Savings Bank

Connecticut Superior Court
29 Conn. Super. 275, 283 A.2d 226 (1971)

Facts

In 1922, Caroline Trowbridge created a trust for the benefit of her daughter, Margaret. Caroline’s trust named the Second National Bank of New Haven (plaintiff) as trustee. The trust paid income to Margaret for life and gave Margaret a general testamentary power of appointment over half the trust principal. Caroline died. Margaret died 28 years later, leaving a will in which she exercised her appointment power by creating a new trust. Margaret’s will named Harris & Trust Savings Bank (defendant) executor of the will and trustee of the trust. The income of this trust was to be paid to Margaret’s daughter, Mary, for a period of 30 years, after which the principal was to be paid to Mary, Mary’s surviving children, or Mary’s descendants per stirpes. Mary had been born in 1929. The Second National Bank of New Haven sued Harris & Trust Savings Bank, alleging that Margaret’s exercise of her appointment power violated the rule against perpetuities, as did the remainder interest that Margaret created for Mary, Mary’s children, or Mary’s descendants.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shea, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership