Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bank of America Corporation

653 F. Supp. 2d 507 (2009), 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15460 (2010)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bank of America Corporation

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
653 F. Supp. 2d 507 (2009), 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15460 (2010)

SR

Facts

On August 3, 2009, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) brought suit against Bank of America Corporation (Bank of America) (defendant). The SEC alleged that Bank of America had defrauded its shareholders by making false statements in its November 3, 2008, proxy statement issued in advance of a $50 billion acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co. (Merrill). Bank of America had stated that Merrill had agreed not to pay year-end bonuses to its executives prior to the merger, but in fact, Bank of America had authorized Merrill to pay up to $5.8 billion in year-end bonuses. On the same day the suit was filed, the parties sought the district court’s approval of a proposed Consent Judgment. The Consent Judgment would enjoin Bank of America from making false statements in proxy statements and would impose a fine of $33 million. Bank of America neither admitted nor denied culpability in the Consent Judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rakoff, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership