From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp. (Chenery I)
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 80, 63 S.Ct. 454, 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943)
The Federal Water Service Corporation (Water Service) sought approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (defendant) for a complex corporate reorganization. The majority of Water Service’s shareholders owned preferred stock that did not include voting rights. Chenery Corporation (plaintiff) owned a controlling block of common stock that did include voting rights, which allowed Chenery to select Water Service’s corporate management. The SEC determined that Water Service’s reorganization must include a conversion of preferred stock to common stock, such that the majority of shareholders would have voting rights. Chenery obtained preferred stock at market price in anticipation of this conversion, in order to maintain a controlling interest in the voting rights. The SEC determined that Chenery had to divest this recently obtained preferred stock in order to adequately distribute shareholder voting power. The SEC justified this determination through an understanding of judicial precedent that corporate management could not trade in a corporation’s stock during a reorganization, due to the management’s fiduciary obligation to all shareholders. The SEC stated that it was acting as it believed a court of equity would in the same situation. Chenery brought suit challenging the SEC’s order. On appeal, the SEC argued that regardless of its application of judicial precedent, its order should be upheld on other grounds, including the SEC’s experience and expertise in overseeing similar corporate reorganizations. The court of appeals set the SEC’s order aside, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Frankfurter, J.)
Dissent (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.