Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hasho
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
784 F. Supp. 1059 (1992)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Ben Hasho, William Mecca, Robert Yule, and Aurelio Vuono (the RRs) (defendants) were registered representatives at J.T. Moran & Co. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) filed a complaint against the RRs and others, alleging that their boiler-room operation violated the antifraud provisions of the securities laws. After trial, the court found that Hasho told a customer he never lost a penny for any client and the warrants he was recommending would rise $3 or $5 in 30 days, and failed to disclose that the company had negative earnings and its warrants were a speculative investment; Mecca told a customer that his predictions had always been correct, another customer that he had inside information, and a third customer that he would have to buy immediately to get a good price, the stock price would double, and the customer would recoup his money in three months, and failed to disclose that the company lost $4.1 million and screamed and cursed when the customer wanted to cancel the purchase; Yule intimated to a customer that he had inside information and said he knew the stock was going to take off and the customer should buy as much as he could, and recommended to a customer who was about to undergo life-threatening surgery that a stock would be in the double digits in six months and would protect the customer’s family; Vuono represented that the price of warrants he was recommending would increase by $1.25 to $1.75 per share in a few months and failed to disclose that the company had historical losses; Hasho, Mecca, and Yule misrepresented that customers would recoup past losses through the recommended stock purchases; and all RRs discouraged sell orders through high-pressure sales tactics.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Edelstein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

