Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kik Interactive, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
492 F. Supp. 3d 169 (2020)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Kik Interactive, Inc. (Kik) (defendant) launched a digital currency called Kin, which Kik envisioned as a way to buy and sell products. Kik promoted Kin by touting the potential to profit from increased demand for Kin. Kik disclosed its intent to use Kin sale proceeds to, among other things, develop a Kin ecosystem. Kik’s first offering stage was a presale that ran until September 11, 2017, in which Kik sold Kin to 50 investors. At the presale’s conclusion, Kik filed a Form D with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff), claiming that the presale was exempt from registration with the SEC under SEC Regulation D. Kik’s second offering stage was a public sale that Kik called a token distribution event (TDE) that commenced on September 12. The TDE’s terms of use disclaimed any ongoing Kik duties to TDE purchasers. On September 26, Kik distributed Kin to the presale and TDE buyers. On that date, Kin could not yet be used to buy anything. In June 2019, the SEC sued Kik, alleging that Kik violated § 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 by offering or selling unregistered securities because the TDE involved unregistered investment contracts. The SEC also alleged that the presale was not exempt under Regulation D because it was part of an integrated offering with the TDE. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hellerstein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
