Securities and Exchange Commission v. Resch-Cassin & Company

362 F. Supp. 964 (1973)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Resch-Cassin & Company

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
362 F. Supp. 964 (1973)

Facts

In mid-1970, Africa, U.S.A., Inc. (Africa) hired Resch-Cassin & Co. (defendant) to underwrite a public offering of Africa stock at $10 per share. Resch-Cassin was required to sell all the shares in the offering or else return the money it received from prospective buyers. Resch-Cassin’s strategy was to hype the stock’s post-offering price. Once trading in Africa shares began on the over-the-counter market, Resch-Cassin bought 3,000 shares at $20 per share to stimulate interest and inflate Africa’s post-offering price. Despite some initial success, the price dropped to $11 per share. Resch-Cassin then recruited Nagler-Weissman & Co., Inc. and Robert Nagler, Adolph Weissman, and Maxwell Forster (collectively, Nagler-Weissman) (defendants) to help with its scheme. Resch-Cassin ordered 1,000 shares from Nagler-Weissman, which began buying Africa shares. Again, the price rose initially, reaching $16 per share, but eventually dropped again; once the underwriting ended in November and by December, the stock price was $4 per share. Until December, Africa’s stock never traded below the $10 offering price. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued Nagler-Weissman and Resch-Cassin, pursuant to § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (exchange act), SEC Rule 10b-5, and § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, alleging it manipulated Africa’s stock price and sought a permanent injunction against Nagler-Weissman, prohibiting further violations of the securities laws.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tenney, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership