Securities and Exchange Commission v. Resch-Cassin & Company
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
362 F. Supp. 964 (1973)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
In mid-1970, Africa, U.S.A., Inc. (Africa) hired Resch-Cassin & Co. (defendant) to underwrite a public offering of Africa stock at $10 per share. Resch-Cassin was required to sell all the shares in the offering or else return the money it received from prospective buyers. Resch-Cassin’s strategy was to hype the stock’s post-offering price. Once trading in Africa shares began on the over-the-counter market, Resch-Cassin bought 3,000 shares at $20 per share to stimulate interest and inflate Africa’s post-offering price. Despite some initial success, the price dropped to $11 per share. Resch-Cassin then recruited Nagler-Weissman & Co., Inc. and Robert Nagler, Adolph Weissman, and Maxwell Forster (collectively, Nagler-Weissman) (defendants) to help with its scheme. Resch-Cassin ordered 1,000 shares from Nagler-Weissman, which began buying Africa shares. Again, the price rose initially, reaching $16 per share, but eventually dropped again; once the underwriting ended in November and by December, the stock price was $4 per share. Until December, Africa’s stock never traded below the $10 offering price. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued Nagler-Weissman and Resch-Cassin, pursuant to § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (exchange act), SEC Rule 10b-5, and § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, alleging it manipulated Africa’s stock price and sought a permanent injunction against Nagler-Weissman, prohibiting further violations of the securities laws.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tenney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.