Securities and Exchange Commission v. Straub

921 F. Supp. 2d 244 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Straub

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
921 F. Supp. 2d 244 (2013)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

In 2005, the Macedonian Parliament enacted a law that liberalized Macedonia’s telecommunications market in ways that were unfavorable to Hungarian telecommunications company Magyar Telekom, Plc. (Magyar). Three of Magyar’s executives, Elek Straub, Andras Balogh, and Tamas Morvai (the executives) (defendants) launched a bribery scheme, storing their plan in a secret document maintained on a Magyar computer. The executives arranged to pay 95 million euros to Macedonian officials, and in return, the Macedonian officials would reduce some of the new law’s negative impact on Magyar. At the time of the executives’ bribery scheme, Magyar’s securities were publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and Magyar was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff). Balogh used emails to further the bribery scheme and conceal the true nature of the bribes. Although these emails were sent outside of the United States, the emails were routed through or stored on network servers in the United States. The SEC charged the executives with violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in federal district court. The executives filed a motion to dismiss the SEC’s complaint, arguing in relevant part that under the FCPA’s interstate-commerce requirement, defendants must knowingly engage in interstate commerce and that the executives did not personally know that their emails were routed through or stored on United States servers.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership