Securities and Exchange Commission v. Straub
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
921 F. Supp. 2d 244 (2013)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
In 2005, the Macedonian Parliament enacted a law that liberalized Macedonia’s telecommunications market in ways that were unfavorable to Hungarian telecommunications company Magyar Telekom, Plc. (Magyar). Three of Magyar’s executives, Elek Straub, Andras Balogh, and Tamas Morvai (the executives) (defendants) launched a bribery scheme, storing their plan in a secret document maintained on a Magyar computer. The executives arranged to pay 95 million euros to Macedonian officials, and in return, the Macedonian officials would reduce some of the new law’s negative impact on Magyar. At the time of the executives’ bribery scheme, Magyar’s securities were publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and Magyar was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff). Balogh used emails to further the bribery scheme and conceal the true nature of the bribes. Although these emails were sent outside of the United States, the emails were routed through or stored on network servers in the United States. The SEC charged the executives with violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in federal district court. The executives filed a motion to dismiss the SEC’s complaint, arguing in relevant part that under the FCPA’s interstate-commerce requirement, defendants must knowingly engage in interstate commerce and that the executives did not personally know that their emails were routed through or stored on United States servers.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.