Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. First Entertainment Holding Corp.

36 P.3d 175, 45 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 610, 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4412 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. First Entertainment Holding Corp.

Colorado Court of Appeals
36 P.3d 175, 45 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 610, 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4412 (2001)

Facts

The board of First Entertainment Holding Corp. (First Entertainment) (defendant) decided to give stock options to one of its directors, Abraham Goldberg (plaintiff), but later changed its mind and canceled a portion of the stock options. Stock options are a type of uncertificated security. Goldberg challenged First Entertainment’s right to cancel the options, and he filed suit. A trial court ordered First Entertainment to place the disputed stock options in the possession of the clerk of the court. Although First Entertainment received the court’s notice and wrote a letter in response, First Entertainment did not give the stock options to the clerk of the court. The trial court issued First Entertainment a contempt citation. First Entertainment appealed. At trial, an expert for Securities Investor Protection Corporation (plaintiff) gave testimony that in order to transfer the stock options to the clerk of the court, First Entertainment would have needed to record the transfer either to Securities Investor Protection Corporation or to the clerk of the court in its corporate books and to provide the clerk with an acknowledgment of the transfer. Additional evidence provided at the trial showed that First Entertainment was aware of how to effect a transfer of an uncertificated security, and that it had the capacity to do so.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Davidson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership