Security Federal Savings & Loan Association of Nashville v. Riviera, Ltd.

856 S.W.2d 709 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Security Federal Savings & Loan Association of Nashville v. Riviera, Ltd.

Tennessee Court of Appeals
856 S.W.2d 709 (1992)

Facts

Tom Robinson (plaintiff) was a businessman. Mickey Ridings (defendant), a lawyer and financial advisor, advised Robinson in business and personal financial matters. Ridings was a partner of Riviera, Ltd. (Riviera) (defendant), which was selling an apartment building. Ridings told Robinson that the building was worth over $2.5 million and that a buyer could take certain tax benefits associated with the building. There was no evidence to substantiate Ridings’s claims about the building’s value, but Robinson bought the building anyway. Robinson then discovered that Ridings’s claims were false. Ridings claimed that he did not profit from the sale, but the sale discharged a debt that Ridings owed to Riviera and increased the value of Ridings’s interest in Riviera. Robinson argued that Ridings’s fraudulent misrepresentations induced Robinson to buy the building. Ridings argued that because he was not acting as Robinson’s attorney during the transaction, the transaction did not take place within a fiduciary relationship, and therefore there was no reasonable reliance and no fraudulent misrepresentation. The trial court found that there was no fiduciary relationship.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cantrell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership