From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Security Stove & Mfg. Co. v. American Railway Express Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
51 S.W.2d 572 (1932)
Security Stove & Mfg. Co. (Security) (plaintiff) manufactured a unique furnace equipped with a combination oil and gas burner. Security desired to ship the furnace from its office in Kansas City, Missouri to Atlantic City, New Jersey for the purpose of exhibiting the furnace at the American Gas Association Convention held in Atlantic City beginning October 11, 1926. On September 18, 1926, Security contacted American Ry. Express Co. (American) (defendant), a carrier, and requested American’s services in shipping the furnace to Atlantic City. Security informed American that the purpose of shipping the furnace was so it could be displayed at the Convention. Security stated that the furnace needed to arrive in Atlantic City no later than October 8th so it could be set up in time for the Convention’s October 11th start date. American agreed to this schedule, and picked up the furnace from Security on October 2nd. The furnace was packed in 21 separate boxes. American delivered the furnace to the booth Security reserved at the Convention in Atlantic City. When Security’s president arrived at the booth, however, he noticed that the most important box was missing. The equipment contained in this box could not be replaced in Atlantic City. American located the missing box and promised to ship it to Security’s president before the Convention ended. American failed to ship the box in time, however, and Security was unable to set up and exhibit the furnace at any point during the Convention. Security brought suit in Missouri state court against American, seeking damages for its expenses incurred in the course of attending and reserving a booth at the Convention. Security argued that it would not have incurred these expenses if it had not relied on American’s promise to ship the furnace to Atlantic City in time for the Convention. The trial court awarded damages to Security, and American appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bland, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.