See v. City of Seattle
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 541 (1967)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
See (plaintiff) owned a private, commercial, locked warehouse. The City of Seattle (defendant) Fire Department sought entry to See’s warehouse to conduct a fire-code inspection. See refused to allow the fire department to enter without a warrant. See was then arrested and convicted for refusing to allow the fire department to inspect his warehouse for compliance with the Seattle Fire Code. See appealed the conviction, arguing that the Seattle Fire Code provision allowing fire department officials to enter See’s private warehouse without a warrant violated See’s Fourth Amendment rights. The Washington Supreme Court upheld See’s conviction, holding that (1) the standard of reasonableness to allow warrantless searches was lower for commercial buildings than it was for private residences; and (2) it was reasonable for Seattle to require business owners to submit to warrantless inspections of commercial property to ensure fire code compliance. See appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.