Seguin v. Berg
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
21 N.Y.S.2d 291 (1940)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Seguin (plaintiff) and Berg (defendant) were involved in a car collision. Seguin sued Berg for damages. Berg denied liability and filed a counterclaim against Seguin. In their cases in chief, Seguin introduced evidence supporting his claim, while Berg introduced evidence to defend himself against Seguin's claim and to support his counterclaim. During rebuttal, the judge overruled Seguin's attempt to call eyewitnesses to the collision on the grounds that their testimony should have been introduced in Seguin's case in chief. Seguin appealed the jury's verdict for Berg to the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division. Seguin contended the judge erred in excluding the eyewitness testimony.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Heffernan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
