Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Segura v. United States

468 U.S. 796 (1984)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Segura v. United States

United States Supreme Court

468 U.S. 796 (1984)

Play video

Facts

Drug enforcement agents suspected that Andres Segura and Luz Marina Colon (the couple) (defendants) were involved in an illegal drug operation based on an informant's tips and their own surveillance. Before obtaining a search warrant, the agents entered the couple's apartment, arrested the couple, and sent them to jail. While in the apartment, the agents observed incriminating evidence but did not conduct a search. The agents remained in the apartment to prevent the destruction of evidence. Nineteen hours later, the agents obtained a warrant, searched the premises, and found additional incriminating evidence. The agents seized that evidence, as well as the evidence they observed the day before. The United States government (plaintiff) charged the couple with drug offenses. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York found the agents' initial entry illegal and granted the couple's pretrial motion to suppress all seized evidence. The government appealed this ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The appellate court affirmed the trial court as to evidence observed before the warrant was obtained but overruled the trial court as to evidence found during the search under warrant. The couple was convicted in trial court, and the court of appeals affirmed the convictions. The couple appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 606,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership