From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
United States Supreme Court
140 S. Ct. 2183 (2020)
Facts
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) (plaintiff) was created in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. Its primary function was to implement a large body of consumer-protection law. The structure of the agency was different from any agency in existence. It had a single director who was appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate. That director served for a five-year period and could only be removed by the president for cause. Additionally, it was funded directly by the Federal Reserve rather than by appropriations from Congress. The CFPB issued Seila Law (defendant) an investigative demand to produce evidence related to possible illegal business practices. Seila Law refused, claiming that the CFPB did not have the authority to issue orders because its structure violated the separation-of-powers doctrine under the Constitution. The CFPB filed a petition in court to enforce the order. The lower courts found that the structure of the CFPB was valid. Seila Law appealed to the Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.