Seinfeld v. Slager

2012 WL 2501105 (2012)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Seinfeld v. Slager

Delaware Court of Chancery
2012 WL 2501105 (2012)

CS

Facts

Frank Seinfeld (plaintiff), a stockholder of Republic Services, Inc. (Republic), a Delaware corporation, sued Donald Slager and other directors of Republic (directors) (defendants) for breaches of fiduciary duty. Seinfeld alleged the directors paid themselves excessive compensation in the form of restricted-stock units (RSUs) under Republic’s stock-incentive plan (stock plan). In 2009 and 2010, Republic’s board of directors (board) granted each director RSUs worth $743,700 and $215,000, respectively. Seinfeld maintained that the directors’ annual compensation, which in 2009 and 2010 consisted mostly of the RSU grants, far exceeded the director compensation of one of Republic’s peer companies. The stock plan, which was approved by Republic’s stockholders, gave the directors nearly unlimited discretion to determine the amounts of stock-based awards. The only limitations were that the total number of shares subject to stock-based awards granted under the stock plan could not exceed 10,500,000 and no individual could be granted stock-based awards covering more than 1,250,000 shares during any one year. Under these limitations, each director could, theoretically, be granted a stock-based award worth more than $20 million every year, depending on Republic’s stock price. Seinfeld contended that because the directors granted themselves the RSUs, the grants were interested-director transactions, which Seinfeld said were unreasonable and constituted corporate waste. The directors moved to dismiss, arguing that because the RSU grants did not violate the terms of the stock plan, the board’s decisions approving those grants were protected by the business-judgment rule.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Glasscock, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership