Seizer v. Sessions

940 P.2d 261 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Seizer v. Sessions

Washington Supreme Court
940 P.2d 261 (1997)

Facts

Rosalie (plaintiff), a Texas resident, married Elmer (defendant), a Washington resident, in Texas. While the couple was living in New York, Rosalie became mentally ill, and Elmer moved her and their daughter back to Texas. Thereafter, Elmer had a 26-year-long common-law marriage with Mary in Colorado. Elmer eventually moved to Washington, where he lived with Barbara, who claimed they were married in Mexico. Elmer won a $100,000 annuity in the Arizona lottery and listed Barbara as his beneficiary. Two years later, Elmer died, and Rosalie’s daughter filed an action seeking Rosalie’s community-property share of Elmer’s lottery winnings. Both Washington and Texas were community-property states, but under Washington law, if Rosalie and Elmer’s marriage was defunct, Rosalie would have no right to any share of Elmer’s lottery winnings, but if it was not, she would be entitled to half; under Texas law, a marriage is only terminated by death or court decree, and Rosalie would be entitled to a one-fourth share of Elmer’s lottery winnings. The trial court held that Washington law applied and dismissed the suit. The appellate court reversed and held that Texas law applied.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership