Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Sekhar v. United States

133 S. Ct. 2720 (2013)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

Sekhar v. United States

United States Supreme Court

133 S. Ct. 2720 (2013)

Facts

New York State’s Common Retirement Fund (the fund) was an employee pension fund for state- and local-government employees. Fund investments were chosen by the state comptroller. The comptroller was considering whether the fund should invest with FA Technology Ventures. The general counsel for the comptroller’s office recommended that the comptroller should not have the fund invest with FA after learning that the state attorney general was investigating another fund managed by FA. The comptroller followed the general counsel’s advice and notified an FA partner of that decision. That FA partner was aware of rumors that the comptroller’s general counsel was having an extramarital affair. Soon after the comptroller notified the FA partner that the fund would not be investing with FA, the comptroller’s general counsel began receiving anonymous emails that threatened to expose the alleged affair to his wife, government officials, and the media if the general counsel did not reverse his recommendation about having the fund invest with FA. The general counsel contacted law enforcement. The threatening emails were traced to the computer of Giridhar Sekhar (defendant), a managing partner of FA. Sekhar was charged and convicted of attempted extortion under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. At trial the jury found that the property right that Sekhar had attempted to obtain was the general counsel’s ability to recommend an investment and further found that Sekhar had sought to exercise that right for himself. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the conviction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

Concurrence (Alito, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 619,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership