Selective Draft Law Cases

245 U.S. 366 (1918)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Selective Draft Law Cases

United States Supreme Court
245 U.S. 366 (1918)

Facts

In 1917, Congress passed an act to authorize the president to temporarily increase the military force of the United States. The act made it the duty of all men aged 21 to 30 to register themselves for the draft. The act further gave the president the power to, via proclamation, select 500,000 men from the body of those registered for active duty as well as a second body of the same number if deemed necessary. The act also gave the president the power to create local boards that considered exemptions based on disability, current-active-duty status, or religious conflict. Several persons required by the act to register (defendants) failed to do so and were prosecuted under the act. They all defended the charges by denying that the Constitution conferred Congress the power to compel military service by selective draft. The defendants further argued that Congress’s power to raise and support armies could be accomplished via volunteer enlistments and that the draft constituted involuntary servitude.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership