Semet Lickstein Morgenstern Berger Friend Brooke & Gordon, P.A. v. Sawada

643 So. 2d 1188 (1994)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Semet Lickstein Morgenstern Berger Friend Brooke & Gordon, P.A. v. Sawada

Florida District Court of Appeal
643 So. 2d 1188 (1994)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Nabuo Sawada (defendant), a Japanese citizen, hired the law firm of Semet Lickstein Morgenstern Berger Friend Brooke & Gordon, P.A. (SLM) (plaintiff) to represent him in a variety of legal proceedings. Sawada failed to pay SLM for its work. SLM then sued Sawada in Dade County, Florida, to enforce payment. In accordance with the requirements of the Hague Convention, SLM had the summons and complaint translated into Japanese and sent the translated papers to the Japanese District Court (JDC) to effect service-of-process on Sawada. Japan had designated the JDC as the Central Authority for receipt of service on behalf of Japanese nationals under the Hague Convention. The JDC then arranged for the Japanese postal service to serve Sawada at his former business address. Pursuant to instructions Sawada provided to the postal service, the papers sent to Sawada’s former business address were forwarded to Sawada’s father. The Japanese postal service completed an affidavit-of-service, had the affidavit-of-service translated into English, and then conveyed the affidavit-of-service to the Florida trial court. Sawada entered a special appearance and moved to dismiss based on defective service-of-process, arguing that the service-of-process was invalid because he had not resided in Japan during the three months immediately preceding service. Sawada did not provide his current address. The Florida trial court granted Sawada’s motion-to-dismiss. SLM appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jorgenson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership