Semet Lickstein Morgenstern Berger Friend Brooke & Gordon, P.A. v. Sawada
Florida District Court of Appeal
643 So. 2d 1188 (1994)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Nabuo Sawada (defendant), a Japanese citizen, hired the law firm of Semet Lickstein Morgenstern Berger Friend Brooke & Gordon, P.A. (SLM) (plaintiff) to represent him in a variety of legal proceedings. Sawada failed to pay SLM for its work. SLM then sued Sawada in Dade County, Florida, to enforce payment. In accordance with the requirements of the Hague Convention, SLM had the summons and complaint translated into Japanese and sent the translated papers to the Japanese District Court (JDC) to effect service-of-process on Sawada. Japan had designated the JDC as the Central Authority for receipt of service on behalf of Japanese nationals under the Hague Convention. The JDC then arranged for the Japanese postal service to serve Sawada at his former business address. Pursuant to instructions Sawada provided to the postal service, the papers sent to Sawada’s former business address were forwarded to Sawada’s father. The Japanese postal service completed an affidavit-of-service, had the affidavit-of-service translated into English, and then conveyed the affidavit-of-service to the Florida trial court. Sawada entered a special appearance and moved to dismiss based on defective service-of-process, arguing that the service-of-process was invalid because he had not resided in Japan during the three months immediately preceding service. Sawada did not provide his current address. The Florida trial court granted Sawada’s motion-to-dismiss. SLM appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jorgenson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.