Semole v. Sansoucie
California Court of Appeal
28 Cal. App. 3d 714, 104 Cal. Rptr. 897 (1972)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Semole (plaintiff) filed a wrongful-death action against multiple defendants, including Robert J. Sansoucie, a fellow employee of his son, John Semole, who was fatally injured at work while he was loading piggyback trailers onto railroad flatcars. Semole’s claim against Sansoucie was based on a section of the labor code that permits an action against a fellow employee when an injury or death is “caused by an act of such other employee which evinces a reckless disregard for the safety of the employee injured, and a calculated and conscious willingness to permit injury or death to such employee.” Sansoucie demurred on the ground that Semole’s complaint did not allege facts sufficient to state a claim under the cited labor code section, and the trial court granted Semole leave to amend. Semole filed a first and second amended complaint, and Sansoucie demurred on the same grounds. The last demurrer was sustained without leave to amend because the complaint simply cited the code section and alleged willful misconduct but was void of factual specificity beyond what would be stated in an ordinary negligence action. Semole appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Herndon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.