Sermchief v. Gonzales
Missouri Supreme Court
660 S.W.2d 683 (1983)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
The nonprofit corporation East Missouri Action Agency (EMAA) provided medical services including family planning, obstetrics, and gynecology, to low-income individuals at several locations throughout Missouri. Nurses provided a variety of services including the taking of patient histories, breast and pelvic examinations, laboratory tests, blood serology, and providing of and giving information about oral contraceptives, condoms, and other family planning and counseling services. Gonzales and other officials with the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (defendants) ordered the nurses and physicians, including Sermchief (plaintiff), to show cause why the nurses were not guilty of the unauthorized practice of medicine in violation of state law and the physicians guilty of aiding and abetting the nurses’ unauthorized practice of medicine activities. Gonzales did not question the skills or competence of the nurses or physicians and none of the nurses’ actions caused any patient harm or injury. All acts by nurses were performed according to written standing orders and protocols prepared and signed by physicians with the EMAA. The nurses and physicians sought a declaratory judgment and injunction asking the court to declare that the nurses’ practices were not the unauthorized practice of medicine. The trial court denied the injunction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Welliver, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.