Seroff v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
162 N.Y.S.2d 770 (1957)

- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
Simon & Schuster, Inc. (defendant) entered into a written publishing contract with Seroff (plaintiff) to write a book about the celebrated pianist-composer Sergei Rachmaninoff. The contract granted Simon & Schuster certain “additional” rights, including the rights of translation and foreign publication, with the added proviso that all revenues derived from the “sale” of these rights be split between Seroff and Simon & Schuster. In 1950, the book was published in the United States to favorable reviews. Following publication, and in accordance with its usual practice, Simon & Schuster sent copies of the book to various sales agents in other countries, including a leading sales agent in France. That sales agent facilitated a sale between Simon & Schuster and Editions Robert Laffont, a French publisher, for the exclusive right to publish and sell the book in the French language throughout the world. Laffont hired a French translator, and in 1954, the French version of the book was published, also to favorable reviews. Seroff protested the French version as “a complete distortion [and flagrant falsification] of my English version.” Seroff brought suit against Simon & Schuster for libel, arguing that Simon & Schuster caused the distorted French version of the book and was therefore responsible for the harm done to his reputation. Simon & Schuster moved to dismiss the complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Geller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.