Sexton v. St. Clair Federal Savings Bank
Alabama Supreme Court
653 So. 2d 959 (1995)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
William Jack Sexton and Marsha C. Sexton (plaintiffs) contracted with St. Clair Federal Savings Bank (defendant) for a loan, secured by a mortgage, to finance the construction of a house on their property. The contract provided that the bank would regularly monitor the builder's work and disburse funds as the construction progressed. All disbursements were to be for the sole purpose of financing the construction. Several weeks after construction began, the bank notified the Sextons that it would make no further disbursements, because the builder was rapidly depleting the loan and using very little of the money for construction-related purposes. The bank foreclosed when the Sextons were unable to continue construction and stopped payments on the loan. The Sextons sued the bank, claiming damages for the mental anguish they allegedly suffered due to the bank's breach of its contractual and fiduciary obligation to regularly monitor the builder's progress. The trial court entered summary judgment for the bank, and the Sextons appealed to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.