From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Shadwick v. City of Tampa
United States Supreme Court
407 U.S. 345 (1972)
Facts
The charter of the City of Tampa (defendant) authorized municipal court clerks to issue arrest warrants for people charged with violating city ordinances. Municipal court clerks, who were not required to have any legal training, were appointed by the city clerk and assigned to work primarily for the municipal court judge. Gerald Shadwick (plaintiff) was arrested for impaired driving pursuant to a warrant issued by a municipal court clerk. Shadwick moved to quash the warrant, arguing that, because it was issued by a nonjudicial officer, it violated his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Shadwick’s motion was denied, and he filed a petition for a writ of common-law certiorari in the Florida courts. Ultimately, the Florida Supreme Court held that Tampa’s municipal court clerks were neutral and detached magistrates within the requirements of the Constitution and were authorized to issue arrest warrants for violations of municipal ordinances. Shadwick appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
