Shady Records, Inc. v. Source Enterprises, Inc.

2005 WL 14920, No. 03 Civ. 9944 (GEL) (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shady Records, Inc. v. Source Enterprises, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2005 WL 14920, No. 03 Civ. 9944 (GEL) (2005)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

In late 1980s and early 1990s, Marshall Mathers (plaintiff), known professionally as Eminem, recorded rap tracks as part of Bassmint Productions (Bassmint), a teenage hip-hop group. Mathew Ruby, another group member, was Bassmint’s producer and archivist. Two of the works Mathers recorded with Bassmint, “Oh Foolish Pride” and “So Many Styles” (collectively, the works), contained racist content. Bassmint never intended to release the works to the public, but Ruby made a compilation tape containing the works for his personal collection. In 2002, under disputed circumstances, Aaron Nieman came to possess Ruby’s compilation tape. Nieman then played the tape for an acquaintance, Ronald Bolos, who convinced Nieman to sell the tape. In October 2003, Bolos sold the compilation tape to Source Enterprises, Inc. (Source) (defendant), the publisher of The Source magazine. Source was a well-known, vocal critic of Mathers, and frequently characterized Mathers, a White man, of being a racist profiteer intentionally exploiting a musical genre created by and for Black artists. After acquiring the compilation tape, Source publicly played the works at a press conference and posted excerpts from the works’ lyrics and audio recordings to Source’s public website. Shortly after, Shady Records, Inc. (Shady) (plaintiff) registered federal copyrights for both works; Ruby and Mathers had previously assigned their interests in the works to Shady. Shady filed a copyright-infringement action against Source. Among numerous other challenges, Source raised the fair-use affirmative defense and moved for summary judgment, arguing that its publication of the works was fair-use news reporting because it showcased Mathers’s alleged racism. Shady countered, arguing that Source’s release of the works was not fair use because Source’s use was predominantly commercial and because Source had acted in bad faith by purchasing the compilation tape containing the works without first ensuring that Nieman and Bolo had the right to sell it.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership