Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Shah v. Cover-It, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court
859 A.2d 959 (2004)


Facts

Khalid Shah (plaintiff) entered into a five-year employment contract with Cover-It, Inc. (Cover-It) (defendant) and Brian Goldwitz (defendant). The contract made Shah a structural-engineering manager for Cover-It and included a salary, three weeks’ paid vacation after the first year of employment, and a flexible 35-hour-per-week schedule. The contract also included a severance package set forth in a schedule of benefits outlining how much money Shah would receive after termination of employment based on how long Shah worked at Cover-It before termination. During Shah’s first year at Cover-It, Shah requested time off for vacation. Goldwitz approved the request. Shah, however, did not return to work for 10 weeks. Once Shah returned to work, he only worked a few days a week, spent much of his time at work surfing the internet unrelated to his job duties, and refused to enter his hours, instead merely writing a “P” for present on his time sheets. A month later, Goldwitz fired Shah after Goldwitz asked Shah if he would be finishing certain designs and Shah responded that he would be taking his time with the designs and was not sure that they would be completed. Shah filed suit against Cover-It and Goldwitz to recover the severance package specified in the contract. The defendants counterclaimed, arguing that Shah had materially breached the contract. The trial court ruled in favor of the defendants. Shah appealed, arguing that the trial court had not found any specific contract term that Shah had breached.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Schaller, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.