Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association
United States Supreme Court
486 U.S. 466 (1988)
- Written by Casey Cohen, JD
Facts
Shapero (defendant), an attorney and member of the Kentucky Bar Association (plaintiff), submitted a written advertisement in the form of a letter to the Kentucky Attorneys Advertising Commission (the Commission) for approval. In the proposed letter, Shapero offered his legal services to individuals who had foreclosure suits filed against them. Although the letter was not misleading and did not contain false information, the Commission did not approve the advertisement on the ground that it violated a then-existing state rule prohibiting the mailing of written advertisements to targeted individuals that had undergone some specific event, such as foreclosure proceedings. Shapero appealed the decision to the Kentucky Supreme Court. The Kentucky Supreme Court replaced the state’s advertising rule with American Bar Association (ABA) Rule 7.3 and upheld the Commission’s decision. Shapero appealed, arguing that the court’s decision and the ABA rule violated the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (O'Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.