Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

884 F.2d 34 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
884 F.2d 34 (1989)

SC
Play video

Facts

The National Labor Relations Act prohibited employers from threats of reprisal against union organization. During a campaign to organize workers of Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc. (defendant), Charles Wyatt, a Shaw’s vice president, told employees that if a union was formed, “the employees would be guaranteed minimum wages and workmen’s comp and that’s where our collective bargaining process would begin.” The National Labor Relations Board (plaintiff) found that the statement was a threat of reprisal, in violation of the act. The board in many prior instances had held that similar “bargaining from scratch” statements did not, without more, constitute threats of reprisal. In issuing its order, the board did not explain its departure from its prior holdings. The board ordered a new election and petitioned the federal court to enforce the order.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership