Shawn C. Carter, et al. v. Iconix Brand Group, Inc., et al.

Index No. 655894/2018 (2018)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shawn C. Carter, et al. v. Iconix Brand Group, Inc., et al.

New York Supreme Court
Index No. 655894/2018 (2018)

Facts

Shawn C. Carter (defendant), a successful African American artist and entrepreneur popularly known as JAY-Z, was sued by Iconix Brand Group, Inc. (Iconix) and other parties (plaintiffs) according to Carter. Iconix separately commenced arbitration against Carter pursuant to an arbitration provision in a licensing agreement Iconix had with Carter. It was agreed the arbitration would be done under American Arbitration Association (AAA) rules. Under these rules, if the parties did not agree on a single arbitrator, then they each would submit four names from the AAA’s large and complex roster of potential arbitrators in the New York area. This roster was supposed to contain arbitrators experienced in complex commercial arbitration. The AAA advertised on its website that it prioritized diversity and promoted the inclusion of minorities who had traditionally been excluded from meaningful participation in arbitration. However, Carter could not identify a single African American in the roster of 200 potential arbitrators. When Carter asked that the AAA provide names of “neutrals of color,” the AAA responded by providing a list of six names, only three of which were African Americans, with one being a partner in the law firm that represented Iconix—an obvious conflict. Carter objected to both this list and available options on the AAA’s website for lack of diversity. The AAA gave Carter an ultimatum: either he could choose arbitrators from the available roster and the six additional names it provided, or the AAA would make the selection for him. The latter happened, and Carter sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against Iconix.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership