Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S

Sheehan v. Monaco Coach Corp.

2006 WL 208689 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sheehan v. Monaco Coach Corp.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
2006 WL 208689 (2006)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Raymond and Lynn Sheehan (the Sheehans) (plaintiffs) purchased from a Florida dealership a motor home manufactured by Monaco Coach Corp. (Monaco) (defendant). The Sheehans had previously owned six motor homes. The Sheehans received Monaco’s limited written warranty at the time of sale. The warranty contained a clause printed in bold capital letters disclaiming liability for consequential damages and stating that the consequential-damages exclusion should be deemed independent of, and would survive, a failure of any limited remedy’s essential purpose. The motor home was sent to a Monaco factory for multiple repairs but continued to have leaks and mold issues. The Sheehans sued Monaco for breach of express and implied warranties, seeking a refund under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA) and loss-of-use damages. Monaco moved for summary judgment, arguing that the MMWA’s refund provision did not apply to limited warranties and the warranty disclaimed liability for consequential damages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Callahan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Sales

Key Terms