Sheehan v. Oblates of St. Francis de Sales
Delaware Supreme Court
15 A.3d 1247 (2011)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Father Francis Norris, a priest from the Oblates of St. Francis (the Oblates), was a teacher at the Salesianum School. James Sheehan (plaintiff) was a student. In 1962, Norris sexually abused Sheehan. Norris’s conduct was criminal under 1962 law. Sheehan did not report the abuse. Norris died in 1985. In 2007, Delaware passed the Child Victim’s Act, which repealed the civil statute of limitations for child sexual-abuse claims and created a two-year window during which previously time-barred claims could be brought. Sheehan sued the Salesianum School and the Oblates, alleging that their negligent and intentional actions caused Sheehan’s injuries. At trial, documentary evidence proved the Oblates were aware that Norris sexually abused children before placing him at the Salesianum School. The court ruled against Sheehan, holding that (1) the Salesianum School was not negligent; (2) although the Oblates were negligent, that negligence was not the proximate cause of Sheehan’s injuries; and (3) the act did not revive intentional tort claims. Sheehan appealed, arguing that the trial court erred by denying his intentional tort claims against the Salesianum School. The Oblates cross-appealed, arguing that (a) the act was unconstitutional because it revived an expired cause of action; and (b) the age of Sheehan’s claim impeded the Oblates’ ability to gather evidence and witnesses to mount a defense.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Steele, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.