Sheehan v. San Francisco 49ers, Ltd.
California Supreme Court
45 Cal. 4th 992, 89 Cal. Rptr. 3d 594, 201 P.3d 472 (2009)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Daniel and Kathleen Sheehan (plaintiffs) are San Francisco 49ers, Ltd. (49ers) (defendant) season-ticket holders. The 49ers implemented a policy requiring that all patrons at their football games submit to a pat-down search prior to coming into the stadium. The pat-down searches were conducted by event-staff screeners. The pat-down policy was implemented to comply with a new policy of the National Football League. The Sheehans sued the 49ers, alleging a violation of their right to privacy under the California Constitution. The 49ers filed a demurrer, seeking to dismiss the Sheehans’ privacy claim for failure to state a cause of action. The trial court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the claim without leave to amend. The Sheehans appealed. The California Court of Appeal held that, as a matter of law, the Sheehans had consented to the searches because they had the option of not entering the stadium. Thus, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s ruling. The Sheehans petitioned the California Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)
Concurrence (Werdegar, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.