Sheen v. Lorre

Docket No. SC111794 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sheen v. Lorre

California Superior Court
Docket No. SC111794 (2011)

SC

Facts

Charlie Sheen (plaintiff) signed a contract with Chuck Lorre and WB Studio Enterprises, Inc. (WB) (defendants) under which Sheen agreed to star in the series Two and a Half Men in exchange for a per-episode fee. The agreement guaranteed Sheen at least 24 episodes. Sheen was hospitalized during production, resulting in suspension of production. Sheen was released from the hospital and, less than two weeks after his hospitalization, claimed to be ready to return to the set. Sheen claimed to be mentally and physically able to continue production, but Lorre had not produced shooting scripts, potentially because he believed that Sheen would be unable to perform. WB sought assurances from Sheen that he would enter treatment for his health issues, but Sheen declined. Ultimately, WB shut down production, believing that Sheen was not healthy enough to continue, especially without medical treatment. Sheen, claiming that he was ready, willing, and able to perform, sought payment for 24 episodes based on the minimum in the contract. The defendants refused. As a result, Sheen filed this complaint against the defendants, alleging breach of contract.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership