Sheet Metal Workers' International Association v. Lynn

488 U.S. 347 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association v. Lynn

United States Supreme Court
488 U.S. 347 (1989)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Edward Lynn (plaintiff) was an elected business agent for the Sheet Metal Workers’ International Association Local 75 (the union) (defendant). Lynn and a majority of other union members believed that the way to alleviate the union’s financial problems was to reduce union expenditures rather than increase dues. The membership thrice defeated proposals to increase dues. The union sent a letter to its international association and asked for the union to be placed under a trusteeship for financial management. The international association placed the union under a trusteeship and gave trustee Richard Hawkins the authority to suspend local union officers and business agents. Hawkins decided that an increase in dues was needed and submitted a proposal to the union’s executive board. At a special meeting, Lynn spoke in opposition to the dues-increase proposal, and the proposal was defeated. Thereafter, Hawkins removed Lynn from his position due to Lynn’s opposition to the increase in dues. Lynn sued the union in district court alleging a violation of his free-speech right under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). The district court granted summary judgment for the union under existing caselaw. The Ninth Circuit reversed, highlighting that the dismissed union employee was elected to his position. The matter came before the Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

Concurrence (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership