Sheff v. O'Neill
Connecticut Supreme Court
238 Conn. 1, 678 A.2d 1267 (1996)
- Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD
Facts
In Connecticut, statutory law created school districts along the boundaries of existing cities and required students to attend public schools in the districts in which they resided. In Hartford school district (Hartford), 92 percent of public-school students were Black or Latino. Most of Hartford’s students came from single-parent poor homes in which English was not spoken. In the surrounding 21 school districts, only seven school districts had minority enrollment that exceeded 10 percent. Hartford’s students performed significantly lower on standardized tests than students in the surrounding districts. Sheff (plaintiff) sued the state (defendant) under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article first, §§ 1 and 20 of the state constitution. The trial court found for the plaintiffs, concluding that enforcement of the districting statutes was the most important factor in the racial and ethnic imbalance in Hartford schools. The state appealed, arguing that judicial relief for educational disparities required a showing of intentional discrimination.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Peters, C.J.)
Concurrence (Berdon, J.)
Dissent (Borden, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.