Shehla Zia v. WAPDA
Pakistan Supreme Court
PLD 1994 SC 693 (1994)
- Written by Andrea Smith, JD
Facts
The Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) (defendant) proposed the construction of an electrical grid station in Islamabad. Residents of the area protested the proposed station, citing the potential for adverse health effects caused by the running electricity. Scientific reports on the subject varied, with no definite conclusion drawn about the likelihood of risk to human health. WAPDA maintained that its plan was completely safe and risk-free. Advocates, including lawyer Shehla Zia (plaintiffs), petitioned the court to consider the proposed construction a human-rights case. WAPDA argued that no fundamental right had been violated.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shah, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.