Sheikh v. Cahill

546 N.Y.S.2d 517 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sheikh v. Cahill

New York Supreme Court
546 N.Y.S.2d 517 (1989)

Facts

A couple was married in Pakistan, and a child, Nadeem, was born. The couple later divorced, and custody of Nadeem remained with both parties. After a year-and-a-half of litigation in New York that did not change the custody award, the mother (defendant), in violation of the New York court’s visitation order, took Nadeem to London, where the father (plaintiff) tracked them down. The father commenced a wardship proceeding in the high court, but he did not commence a Hague Convention proceeding, which requires the prompt return of children abducted to or wrongfully retained in a country when both that country (in this case the United States) and the country of the child’s habitual residence (in this case the United Kingdom) are parties to the Hague Convention and the child is under 16. The father’s custody application was denied, and the high court issued a final order that Nadeem was to remain a ward of the court of London with his care and control to remain with the mother. Thereafter, Nadeem had visitation with his father in the United States, and after the end of his first summer visit, the father refused to return Nadeem to the United Kingdom and applied to the New York court for custody. The high court declared that Nadeem was wrongfully retained. The mother sought the return of Nadeem to her based on the order of the high court and the terms of the Hague Convention.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rigler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership