From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Sheils v. Wright
Kansas Court of Appeals
357 P.3d 294 (2015)
Facts
Richard Sheils executed and recorded a transfer-on-death (TOD) deed that would transfer his house to his brother, Charles Sheils (plaintiff), when Richard died. Later, Richard signed a deed revoking the TOD deed and transferring the house to both Richard and his nephew, Kevin Wright (defendant), as joint tenants with a right of survivorship. Under this deed, both Richard and Wright owned the house, and if one of them died, sole ownership of the house would then pass to the surviving one. Richard gave this joint-tenancy deed to his attorney to record, which counted as legal delivery. However, the attorney did not formally record the joint-tenancy deed until two weeks after Richard died. Charles filed a lawsuit claiming title to the house under the TOD deed. Under the governing statute, a TOD deed could be revoked only by recording a revocation while the owner was still alive—and Richard’s revocation paperwork was not officially recorded while he was still alive. Wright responded that Richard was legally allowed to do whatever he wanted with the house while he was alive, including transferring it to someone else. Thus, Wright claimed that the joint-tenancy deed was valid and that, as the surviving joint tenant, he owned the house. The trial court found that Richard had not validly revoked the TOD deed and that Charles owned the house. Wright appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Leben, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
